Andrea Unger’s DAX breakout strategy was so simple I couldn’t resist trying it out myself.

Now, there are many approaches I could have taken to work out if this strategy was right for me and if, indeed, it worked at all.

If you’ve been following my podcast, you’ll know I’ve been diving deep into trade automation – so that’s exactly where I started.

Trade automation meant I was able to quickly turn his entire strategy into software that would put me in the driving seat when it came to testing and optimizing it to suit my risk appetite.

First, let’s breakdown the strategy

Andrea strategy is best described by him. So, here’s the quote from the podcast episode where he revealed the full strategy:

andrea-unger“Well, considering what I said I suggest to evaluate the first hour breakout! This is an “old” approach to buy or sell the breakout of the range of the first hour.

In today’s markets it’s not easy to find where it still works but I built a strategy on the DAX future which is still producing results. The setup is valid all days except Fridays and enters levels calculated from high or low of the first hour range bar with a displacement of 75% of the range itself. An additional filter is not to trade if the body of daily range of yesterday was larger than 75% of the total range.

Exit is at the end of the day or, if prices retrace, at high (for longs) or low (for shorts) of the first hour.”

When you break it down, the whole think looks like this:

strategy-explained

Back Testing at the “Speed of Byte”

With Andrea being an Algo Trader, it was great to get a well defined strategy with mechanical rules that were not left for interpretation.

So, taking his rules I was able to automate the strategy in no time at all.

One decision I made that I normally don’t, was to use the historical data from my Broker instead of my normal testing platform. Their data was pretty good and a nice match to their live data so I knew it I would be happier trading it live if I could find something that worked.

Testing the original strategy…

From March 2013 to March 2016 it was profitable and had a nice upwards curve with a few down periods, but I wanted to test it using recent market data as the markets tend to change every 18 months or so. So, I decided to optimize the strategy using data from the past year only: March 2015 – March 2016…. And here’s the result:

FirstTest

Total return: $140.38

After running this test I thought, “Yes! I have the beginnings of something profitable… Next step… make it even better!!”

Oh, and if you’d like to learn how to automate strategies (without touching any code), like I’ve done with Andrea’s, simply subscribe below:
[optin-cat id=1291]

Now, below you’ll find the exact steps I took to turn this strategy into something I would be confident trading.

And at the end I reveal the full strategy I’m planning to trade on my live account.

Let’s get into it!

Step 1. How to Make a Good Strategy Great

This is where the fun begins.

We have a solid strategy provided by a 4 Time World Trading Competition Winner, and our first back test over a few years has shown promising results. So, it’s time to get to work and see how far we can take this strategy.

I approach this with three things in mind:

  • Will I be able to trade this strategy from an emotional standpoint?
    • Can I handle how often it loses?
    • Can I handle how often it trades?
    • Can I let the winners run?
    • Can I risk enough to make it worth my while?
    • Am I confident the strategy is robust?

The above point will mean I can trade the strategy live and be happy with my level of risk. It will also mean I’ll be less likely to interfere with the strategy and handle losing days or weeks if I have to.

  • Are the changes I’m making to the strategy, changing it to fit an upwards curve?
    • Am I changing the rules to avoid 1 or 2 big losses?
    • Am I changing the rules to catch 1 or 2 big trades?

The above point will mean that the final strategy won’t self-destruct in the future due to anomalies that are bound to occur.

  • Am I happy with the metrics?
    • The number of consecutive losses
    • The profit percentage
    • The average winning trade size
    • The maximum draw down

The above point will help me determine if it’s a strategy is worthwhile trading and robust enough to accommodate any issues, e.g. if I miss one day out of a month due to a technical issue or some other problem.

Step 2. Get Creative with Profit Opportunities

To help me come up with opportunities or ideas to squeeze more profit from this strategy (or any strategy for that matter) I head back to the charts first to see if I can find obvious patterns that happen enough to warrant further testing or investigation.

For this strategy I thought the following had promise:

Idea 1)

idea1

The losing trade % was quite high, so what if I could offset the losers?

Idea 2)

recovery-trade

 

The price often went further in the same direction when a loser was hit, so what if I entered a trade in the opposite direction as soon as the stop loss was hit, and made that trade the same size as the losing trade?

Idea 3)

pendingorder-open

If the first trade was a loser, sometimes the price would have a good trend in the opposite direction, so instead of deleting the pending order that wasn’t triggered, what if I let it trigger that order as well?

Idea 4)

delete-po

What if I adjusted the length of time the Pending Order was open for, so for example, deleting the Pending Order after the 2nd bar or the 12th bar. Would that prevent losers being hit and still catch most of the winners?

I had a few more ideas that I tried out and I will probably take a fresh look again in the future… sometimes a break to let the dust settle can be a good thing.

Step 3. Optimize. Optimize. Optimize.

As with all strategies, they can be broken down into smaller parts that you can look at individually in an attempt to improve results.

Below are the core components to any strategy and the insights I found that will help me pick my final strategy.

1. Can I improve the Entry?

For this strategy I tried optimizing the entry point based on the day of the week as a starting point. Here you can clearly see that some days are better than others. So, it’s a case of picking the days you want to leave out versus the ones to include. Below it’s pretty clear that Monday should be left out. What’s unknown is if I remove the Prior Day Filter (as per Andrea’s suggestion) will I affect these results… So we’ll need to test that too!

Here are the results from my daily testing:

Monday Profit $-4.69:

monday

Tuesday $74.38:

tuesday

Wednesday $19.40:

wednesday

Thursday $29.07:

thursday

Friday $22.22:

friday

Next up is the distance of the entry offset taken from the first candle.

Currently it’s set at 75%, but would another figure work better? Here are the results I received whilst running an optimization test:

hoursoptimised

I found that 65% actually produced the best results for profitability and the region around it also produced high results, so I could be quite confident that numbers round this region would be robust. Here’s the chart:

65percenttest

Total Return: $157.71 (up 11% on our original test)

I had a hunch the expiry time of the Pending Orders may also be a key factor, so optimized for Order Expiry time. Sticking with the 65% range, will we better the results?
hoursoptimised

A dramatic improvement in the overall return but there is a more prominent negative return period that I would have to cope with emotionally.

Here are the results using an 8 hour expiry for our pending orders:

8hourtest

Total Return: $169.03 (up 17% on our original test)

So, here are the metrics that worked from an Entry point of view (albeit independently):

– Offset by 65% of the 1st hours range

– Expire the Pending Orders after 8 hours

– Best trading days Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday

I know, it’s a bit different from Andrea’s results but mine are skewed to what’s happening in the market now versus what worked 5 years ago.

Step 2. Can I improve the Exit?

Trade exit can make or break a strategy, so trying multiple exit strategies that make sense can sometime yield better results. That said, I’ve found that the simplest strategies are often the best.

Here’s what I tried based on my profit opportunity ideas:

Based on Idea 3 above – leave both pending orders active until they are triggered or not. This way I’ll either get a trend in one direction, two stop outs or catch the trend after the original stop out, or only have the original stop out and no trend on the opposite side…. Confusing eh! Here’s where we ended up:

leavependingorder

With 8 hours and 65% as the settings this end result of $129.23 didn’t improve the benchmark.

I tried idea’s 1, 2 and 4 out as well – all with no success. As I said earlier. The simple exits usually work the best.

Step 3. Can I improve any Filters?

I added Andrea’s Prior Day filter to see if that made a positive or negative change.

withpreviousday

Well, we were actually worse off with a result of $138.59. So, with this filter we may be filtering out good profit opportunities.

Step 4. Can I put everything together to make it work for me?

First, what do we know now?

  • We have a vague idea which weekday’s work best using the original settings but don’t know how they work with other settings and if the optimized settings are better on certain weekdays than others.
  • We know the filter may give up profit opportunities and doesn’t really help give us a nicer equity curve
  • We may suffer periods of several losing trades with pending orders lasting 8-12 hours
  • We have some good ranges for when to cancel the pending order and the offset of our pending order from the first bar high and low – 50-75%

Secondly, what don’t we know?

  • We don’t know how all the above work together – days, hours, offsets. How do all the combinations of these perform in unison?

To answers this question we need to run a test across multiple combinations.

So, to lock in my final strategy I’m going to run an optimization test for each weekday and for the hour periods 1-12 and offset between 50-100%, then pick the weekdays that will fit me emotionally, not necessarily by the amount of profit I can yield.

Here are the results for Monday:

monday-opt

Not much in the way of successful strategies with 72% unprofitable. There could be a case here for not including Monday’s in the final strategy.

monday-opt-graph
Total Monday Return $33.85 (up 100%+ from our original test)

Here are the results for Tuesday:

Unger DAX OptimizationReport - Tuesday

The chart above shows the best area is round the 1 hour pending order cancellation period and the 50% – 80% mark. With the best being at 55%.

Running the best Tuesday with settings of 55% offset, 1 hour pending order expiration and the filter turned on produced this:

tuesday-opt

Total Tuesday Return $108.60 (up 31% from our original test)

Here are the results for Wednesday:

wednesday-opt

The interesting settings look to be around the 8-9 hour mark and the 85%-100% mark. When you look at the best result below (9 hours & 90%) you see that there isn’t a steady curve which could be a consideration for leaving Wednesday out.

wednesday-opt-graph

Total Wednesday Return $46.82 (up 59% from our original test)

Here are the results for Thursday:

thursday-opt-graph

A number of combinations work on a Thursday, so overall it’s a good day compared to, say, Wednesday. Running the best settings 7 hours and 70% produced the following:

thursday-opt Total Thursday Return $100.52 (up 71% from our original test)

Here are the results for Friday:
friday-opt

Overall positive, but began to break even after a while. Something to consider when going live.

friday-opt-graph

Total Friday Return $54.82 (up 59% from our original test)

Step 4. Decisions. Decisions. Decisions.

To put this whole thing together we need to make a couple of key decisions:

  • Do we expect each week day to act in it’s own way? Or does that fall into the realms of “curve fitting”?
  • Should we find a middle point for settings that accommodate the whole week?

My gut feel is that each day acts differently, due to news alerts, volatility I’ve seen in each day, and the natural ebb and flow of the week (Monday start and Friday finish). So, individual settings per day it is.

  • What days of the week do we want to trade?

Smooth upward curves would have us just trading Tuesday and Thursday, but we’d give up potential profit from Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Other things to consider are how profitable each day is. We can see from the Monday and Wednesday green graphs that they have plenty of gaps  (about 50% for Wednesday and 72% for Monday), so if there were any days I wouldn’t trade if would be those two. So, let’s go with Tuesday, Thursday and Friday.

When I’ve built this I can then see how it reacts with the Prior Day filter by toggling it on or off… And then we’ll have our final strategy!

With Prior Day Filter:

FinalStrategyFilter

Total Return $271.47 (48% up from the original)

Without Prior Day Filter:

FinalStrategyNoFilter

Total Return $231.77

Voilà! I Have My Strategy

It was a fun journey to land this strategy and the end result is one I feel:

  • Ultra-confident trading live
  • Happy applying larger position sizes
  • Will last for a long time to come

Here are the final changes I’ve decided to make to Andrea’s original strategy:

1) Only trade Tuesday, Thursday and Friday using their best settings based on optimization

  • Tuesday: 1 hour expiry, 55% first candle size
  • Thursday: 7 hour expiry, 70% first candle size
  • Friday: 10 hour expiry, 60% first candle size

2) Keep the prior day filter, however, this could be optimized further in the future to see what the optimal body % is.

So, when all was said and done, he had a pretty solid strategy, but now I have the confidence to trade with it live and a better understanding of the expected returns and level of capital I’d be willing to put at risk.

2 Things Before You Go

To see how all this work turns out in my live trading, make sure you subscribe to the 52 Traders podcast, and for more immediate gratification…

If you’d like to join me on this journey of trade automation and learn exactly how to turn your strategies into software you can subscribe to my 5 Day Complimentary “Automate My Trading” Mini Course below:

[optin-cat id=1293]

Fatten Your Wallet With

10 FREE Episodes


No Spam Privacy Policy

Great! You're In. Check your email for your Login Details and Link.


HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES, OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES, ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL, OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM, WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

At all times any and all information on, or product purchased from, this website, is for educational purposes only and is under no circumstance intended to provide financial advice. No guarantee is represented from any statements about profits or income, whether express or implied. As no trading system is guaranteed, your actual trading may result in losses. You will at all times accept the full responsibilities for all of your actions, including, but not limited to, trades, profit or loss. You agree to hold 52traders.com, Ziba Online Limited, the site's legal owners, AT and any authorized distributors of this information at all times harmless in any and all ways. By using our product(s) this constitutes your acceptance of our user agreement.

You agree by using this site, and related sites of ours and any of our material content you may receive either from such site or in any other form and that, accepting our terms and conditions of purchase that you agree that you, and you alone, must ensure that the use of any of the materials purchased from our site in any manner or form at all, is in compliance with your national, local, federal, state or county laws.

CFTC - U.S. Government Required Disclaimer:

Forex, futures and options trading have large potential rewards, but also large potential risk. You must be aware of the risks and be willing to accept them in order to invest in the futures and options markets. Don't trade with money you can't afford to lose. Our website, product contents, and materials are neither a solicitation nor an offer to Buy/Sell futures or options. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those discussed on our website or in any materials. The past performance of any trading system or methodology is not necessarily indicative of future results. Substantial risk is involved. Forex trading has large potential rewards, but also large potential risk. You must be aware of the risks and be willing to accept them in order to invest in the Forex markets.

Don't trade with money you can't afford to lose. Nothing in our course or any materials or website(s) shall be deemed a solicitation or an offer to Buy/sell futures and/or options. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those discussed on our site. Also, the past performance of any trading methodology is not necessarily indicative of futures results. Trading involves high risks and you can lose a lot of money.

CFTC RULE 4.41 – HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER-OR-OVER COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFIT OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.